1,242 frames out of 13,807 frames (9%) stacked in Autostakkert; and processed in Registax and Gimp.
Data taken at approx. 2:36 am on 8/8. (19 day moon, 80% illuminated.)
C11, 2x TV barlow, Astromania ADC, QHY 462C. The original video is green. So I had to do some channel mixing in Gimp to get it to B&W.
You can definitely see 6 craterlets and mostly 1 more. There are about another 7-8 "maybe" craterlets which tells me the resolution here is around 1.5 - 2 km.
The blurry parts in the lower left, upper left and a little bit of lower-mid right were problems in Autostakkert.
Re-stacked with more alignment points in Autostakkert so I could preserve more edge areas. Spent a a fair amount of time in Gimp to dial this in. I purposefully left some noise in order to preserve detail.
In Gimp, under the 'Filters -> Enhance ->' menu, there is a really handy bluring tool called, "Symmetric Nearest Neighbor" menu. This is really useful!
Just
showing the alignment points. Most of these were generated from
Autostakkert. But I removed mabye 50-60 points that seemed redundant OR
emphasized a non-existent 'line'. I added around 100 points by hand on
features visible in the lower left and upper left areas. I also used a
reference image from CloudyNights to help place harder-to-see alignment
points in Plato. I probably could have spent more time placing
alignment points on fainter craterlets.
The
larger question I have is if more aperture will get me better
resolution? In the most obvious sense, the answer is yes, but the
issue is seeing.
No comments:
Post a Comment